Remember the myth (aka lie) that the Benghazi attack on September 11th, 2012 was because of a movie? And remember a couple of weeks ago the New York Times tried to contradict its own earlier reports by claiming their investigation concluded that this attack was because of… a movie?
News this week has been coming out which does not paint a good picture for the Obama administration or for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in spite of the mainstream trying to still claim Benghazi is just ‘memes’ that republicans won’t stop politicizing. On January 13th, the Lean Forward Obama Network MSNBC host Alex Wagner referred to Benghazi as one of those “bones that can never be buried.”
On January 15th, in a response to a Senate Report on Benghazi, California Senator Diane Feinstein defended Clinton over the security situation in Ben...i, saying “it’s interesting that the first thing out of the box is something that’s political. There is no evidence that Secretary Clinton even knew about this.” She also went on to claim that some of the groups involved were ‘loosely’ connected with the international Al Qaeda group, but not with the Al Qaeda in Pakistan.
No Senator, what’s interesting is that after over a year of information trickling out about the events leading up to, during and claims made after the Benghazi attack, that you would have the nerve to politicize it by defending the woman who wants to be the next President of the United States. Sorry Senator, but Americans might have been purposely kept in the dark about Benghazi in October and November of 2012 so Obama could be reelected, but contrary to what you and others may believe Americans aren’t so stupid to fall for it now.
http://politichicks.tv/column/benghazi-bone-refuses-buried/
You need to be a member of As Creepy As Clowns to add comments!
Join As Creepy As Clowns